You are currently browsing the category archive for the ‘politik’ category.
Lov om homovielser* blev i dag vedtaget i Folketinget; men hele 24 medlemmer af folketinget (MF) stemte imod forslaget:
Anne-Mette Winther Christiansen (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
Peter Juel Jensen (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
Lars Christian Lilleholt (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
Ulla Tørnæs (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
Troels Lund Poulsen (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
Birthe Rønn Hornbech (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
Hans Andersen (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
Jane Heitmann (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
Anni Matthiesen (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
Tom Behnke (KF)
Lene Espersen (KF)
Samt alle fra Dansk Folkeparti
To stemmer hverken for eller imod forslaget:
Louise Schack Elholm (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
Torsten Schack Pedersen (Venstre, Danmarks Liberale Parti)
—-
Jeg er røstet over, at så mange medlemmer af Folketinget er så meget modstandere af frihed og lighed.
Kristne vil have retssag om homovielser
* L 106 Forslag til lov om ændring af lov om ægteskabs indgåelse og opløsning, lov om ægteskabets retsvirkninger og retsplejeloven og om ophævelse af lov om registreret.
—-
Mange folketingsmedlemmer gad ikke engang, være til stede ved afstemningen:
Jacob Bjerregaard S Fraværende
Erling Bonnesen V Fraværende
Anne Baastrup SF Fraværende
René Christensen DF Fraværende
Kim Christiansen DF Fraværende
Jens Henrik Thulesen Dahl DF Fraværende
Kristian Thulesen Dahl DF Fraværende
Thomas Danielsen V Fraværende
Mikkel Dencker DF Fraværende
Dennis Flydtkjær DF Fraværende
Thyra Frank LA Fraværende
Claus Hjort Frederiksen V Fraværende
Karin Gaardsted S Fraværende
Eva Kjer Hansen V Fraværende
Torben Hansen S Fraværende
Camilla Hersom RV Fraværende
Henrik Høegh V Fraværende
Bertel Haarder V Fraværende
Doris Jakobsen SIU Fraværende
Kristian Jensen V Fraværende
Leif Lahn Jensen S Fraværende
Thomas Jensen S Fraværende
Karen Jespersen V Fraværende
Edmund Joensen SP Fraværende
Birgitte Josefsen V Fraværende
Benedikte Kiær KF Fraværende
Pia Kjærsgaard DF Fraværende
Rasmus Horn Langhoff S Fraværende
Esben Lunde Larsen V Fraværende
Henrik Sass Larsen S Fraværende
Karsten Lauritzen V Fraværende
Lone Loklindt RV Fraværende
Kristian Pihl Lorentzen V Fraværende
Mogens Lykketoft S Fraværende
Sophie Løhde V Fraværende
Brian Mikkelsen KF Fraværende
Jeppe Mikkelsen RV Fraværende
Karsten Nonbo V Fraværende
Karin Nødgaard DF Fraværende
Joachim B. Olsen LA Fraværende
Sara Olsvig IA Fraværende
Søren Pind V Fraværende
Rasmus Prehn S Fraværende
Lars Løkke Rasmussen V Fraværende
Merete Riisager LA Fraværende
Mads Rørvig V Fraværende
Anders Samuelsen LA Fraværende
Johanne Schmidt-Nielsen EL Fraværende
Sjúrður Skaale JF Fraværende
Peter Skaarup DF Fraværende
Finn Sørensen EL Fraværende
Hans Christian Thoning V Fraværende
Frank Aaen EL Fraværende
Morten Bødskov S Fraværende
Villy Søvndal SF Fraværende
Carsten Hansen S Fraværende
Nicolai Wammen S Fraværende
Ole Sohn SF Fraværende
Henrik Dam Kristensen S Fraværende
Christine Antorini S Fraværende
Morten Østergaard RV Fraværende
Helle Thorning-Schmidt S Fraværende
Christian Friis Bach RV Fraværende
Uffe Elbæk RV Fraværende
Pia Olsen Dyhr SF Fraværende
Ida Auken SF Fraværende
Nick Hækkerup S Fraværende
Bjarne Corydon S Fraværende
Vi ser nærmere på instruktion fra Bibelen om behandling af slaver
Bibelen instruerer: Behandling af slaver
Apostel Claver T. Kamau-Imani vækkelsestale til Texas Conservative Action Committee møde 11.01.11.
Video 1/2
Video 2/2
Video af the Texas Freedom Network
Christine O’Donnell har brug for uddannelse
Countdown with Keith Olbermann, MSNBC, 27. september 2010
The Ed Show, MSNBC, 27. september 2010
Hvad kender vi til Stop Islamiseringen?
Stifter: Anders Gravers.
Pamela Geller hos Bill O’Reilly på Fox News
Organisationen har spredt sig fra Danmark til en lang række andre lande:
Stop Islamiseringen i Danmark
Stop Islamization of America med Pamela Geller
Stopp islamiseringen av Norge
Stop Islamisation Of Europe
Sioe France
SIOE Deutschland
SIOE Spain
Facebook sider:
SIO Australien
SIOE Østrig
SIOE Belgien
SIOE Bosnia og Herzegovina
SIOE Bulgarien
SIOE Danmark
SIOE England
SIOE Færøerne
SIOE Frankrig
SIOE Tyskland
SIOE Italien
SIOE Norge
SIOE Polen
SIOE Serbien
SIOE Spanien
SIOE Srpska
SIOE Sverige
John F. Kennedy’s address to the Ministerial Association of Greater Houston, September 12, 1960, during his presidential campaign.
With Americans marking the horrific attacks on September 11, 2001, and the heated culture war debate over construction of mosques and the issue of religious liberty, a different sort of anniversary occurs.
John F. Kennedy was in the midst of a heated presidential campaign against Vice President Richard Nixon. Polls showed that substantial numbers of Americans were concerned over Kennedy’s Roman Catholic affiliation; not since the 1928 campaign of Al Smith, also a Catholic, had religion played so defining and poignant a role at the ballot box. Democrats had relied on the mostly-Protestant South as a reliable bastion of electoral support. That “Southern Strategy” was now in doubt, as the traditional fault lines between Catholics and Protestants suddenly meant that millions of voters would cross party lines amidst fears of “Popery” and possible Vatican control of the government.
Adding to that pervasive angst were statements from some church officials that “it was time to elect a Roman Catholic president.” Other issues were front-and-center, too, many related to the separation of church and state, Should “parochaid,” government assistance to Catholic schools, be permitted? Were Roman Catholics — like Sen. Kennedy — more loyal to the Vatican than to the Constitution? Would a Catholic president provide the Holy See with a new and dangerous level of political influence?
Kennedy, the scion of a wealthy patrician New England family, had established a reputation as a staunch anti-communist and a political moderate. One biographer described the young Massachusetts Senator as “a staunch supporter of the (Catholic) Church.” Indeed, questions about the vast economic and political influence of the Vatican was a common theme in political narratives. In the late 1940s, a host of publications documented there Holy See’s role in America; most notable was Paul Blanchard’s series of carefully-researched articles appearing in the liberal Nation Magazine , which became the basis for the 1948 book “American Freedom and Catholic Power.”
Unlike today, the phrase “separation of church and state” was not something taken lightly by either political leaders or news media, but rather a concept that was rightly seen as the bedrock of the American political order.
With just two months until the November, 1960 election, Rev. Norman Vincent Peale — a prominent Protestant clergyman and author of the popular self-held book “The Power of Positive Thinking “: — convened a group of Protestant leaders who doubted Kennedy’s
loyalty to the United States over his religious ties to the Vatican. The Holy See, according to Peale’s group, intended “to demolish America’s wall of separation between church and state.”
Their manifesto, of course, was sectarian and self-serving. The “Protestant Establishment” had enjoyed a sordid, intimate relationship with government in the United States. Public schools still used the Bible as a devotional and instructional text; a number of states required a belief in god in order for someone to hold an office of public trust; and in the wake of World War II, huge swaths of land had been donated or sold off at discount prices to religious groups. Churches were tax exempt, and organized religion enjoyed a battery of other privileges which, years later, would be documented in books like Madalyn O’Hair’s “Freedom Under Siege.”
Equally distressing was the fact that while Peale and his associates loudly denounced Kennedy as an opponent of the Establishment Clause, the mainline Protestant denominations opposed any attempt to curtail the “special rights” and privileges of organized religion, or secularize the American public square.
Kennedy, knowing that he had to respond to such charges, decided to address the Houston Ministerial Association meeting on September 12, 1860. Kennedy reversed his previous support for government aid to private and parochial schools, and announced that he opposed further diplomatic tie with the Vatican It was a risky, delicate political move. His campaign staff knew well the importance of a heavy turn-out of Catholic voters.
In the end, John F. Kennedy was elected President of the United States. His speech, criticized widely even in his campaign organization and stable of key advisers, put the debate over church-state separation into the front ranks of American discourse.
It remains there today, a key element in the culture-wars pitting secularism and freedom against the tyrannical establishment of religion.
Læs i bibelen
Ateisme og fritænkning 
Nye kommentarer